Talking Point: No chance of truce, will ‘fight’ it out

“I will fight for that. I have fought for that... We have been there for 50 years, its not one day or two days,” Mistry said a day after he quit from the boards of six listed Tata companies and declared he will take his battle against Tatas to courts. 

“This is not about a business group fight. It is not about those type of things. If that was the situation, I would like to sit in the position. That’s why I have removed myself from the position, because it is not me looking for position or power,” Mistry told PTI in an interview. 

He replied in negative when asked specifically if his family will exit its ownership in Tata Sons, the holding company of the country’s biggest conglomerate, if he loses his fight in the courts. Mistry family’s 18.4 per cent holding in Tata Sons is valued at close to Rs 1 trillion and is the single largest non-promoter group investor for over five decades.

Mistry surprised all by resigning from all six key Tata group companies yesterday, even before the EGMs of some firms where shareholders were to vote on Tata Sons’ proposal to oust him from directorship. 

When asked if there is a chance of smoking the peace pipe, Mistry sought to distinguish his fight from feuds in India Inc’s families, saying he is fighting for larger issues like ethics and governance at what is arguably one of the most revered conglomerates. 

“This is about governance and reforms. If governance reforms happen, I benefit, I am not saying no to that,” Mistry said. 

The 48-year-old Mistry also ruled out demanding more board positions at Tata Sons. He continues to be the lone family representative on the board at present and has ruled out giving up on it. “I am not looking for board positions. I am looking for good governance. We will see what happens in the future,” said Mistry, who was the first Chairman from a non-Tata family at the 149year salt-to-software giant. 

Mistry also said Tatas are at an “inflection point” and there is a need to institutionalise processes to future-proof the business and feared that it would go down a “slippery slope” if action is not taken.