Reporter’s Diary: Withholding lawyers’ names puts reporters in a fix

What’s in a name? that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, said Shakespeare. But the Madras High Court seem to strongly differ with it, if one has to go by its recent direction to the media to abstain from using the names of counsels as it feels that it would provide indirectly make the advocates popular in legal circles.

By :  migrator
Update: 2016-10-12 04:53 GMT
A file photo of the Madras High Court

Chennai

Even in the use of judges’ name, the division bench comprising Justices Nooty Ramamohana Rao and S S Sundar held that judges are just performing their duty and that their names are irrelevant while reporting the case in dailies and other magazines.   

A circular in this regard was also circulated to all media houses recently. But the diktat has come as a dampener, especially for reporters, since the authenticity of any news depends on quoting the advocates and the Judges concerned. Matters get worse for the visual media as they can’t hide the face of the advocate while interviewing him/her. With a contempt of court threat hanging over the High Court reporters’ shoulders for spelling out names, scribes now have to attribute verdicts to the various benches while the petitioners and defendants will henceforth be represented by ‘an advocate of the Madras High Court’.

D Sivarajan, Chennai

Visit news.dtnext.in to explore our interactive epaper!

Download the DT Next app for more exciting features!

Click here for iOS

Click here for Android

Similar News