'Artificially dimming the Sun may not help prevent Antarctic ice melt'
"The window of opportunity to limit the global temperature increase to below 2 degrees is closing fast," said ice modelling specialist Johannes Sutter from the varsity
Representative Image (Photo: IANS)
LONDON: Geoengineering has emerged as the latest option to cool the climate. But artificially "dimming the sun" does not work without decarbonisation and entails high risks, according to a new study.
A key reason for the increased interest in geoengineering is the avoidance of tipping points at which the climate could change abruptly and irreversibly. These include the melting of the West Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets and the associated metre-high sea level rise.
Researchers from the University of Bern in Switzerland investigated the question of whether the melting of ice in West Antarctica could be prevented by artificially influencing solar radiation.
"The window of opportunity to limit the global temperature increase to below 2 degrees is closing fast," said ice modelling specialist Johannes Sutter from the varsity.
That is why, he said, it is necessary to use theoretical models to study the effects and risks of "solar radiation management (SRM)" -- a term used to describe various methods of blocking solar radiation in order to make the Earth cooler.
Specifically, Sutter and his team use ice model simulations to investigate what would happen if aerosols -- suspended particles in a gas -- introduced into the stratosphere succeeded in blocking solar radiation from the earth -- a dimming of the sun.
They found "that the most effective way to prevent long-term collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is rapid decarbonisation." The chances of a longer-term stable ice sheet are greatest if greenhouse gas emissions were reduced to net zero "without delay."
Further, to dim the Sun, Sutter said that it would take a whole fleet of extremely high-flying aeroplanes to spread millions of tonnes of aerosols in the stratosphere.
However, this technical intervention in the climate would have to be maintained without interruption and for centuries. If the intervention were stopped as long as the greenhouse concentration in the atmosphere remained high, the temperature on earth would quickly rise by several degrees.
Moreover, the potential side effects are still insufficiently researched and range from a shift in the monsoon regime to changes in ocean and atmospheric circulation. Ocean acidification would also continue.
It can also have political and social effects: The use of techniques such as solar dimming could lead to climate protection measures being slowed down or even prevented.
"Geoengineering would be another global experiment and a potentially dangerous human intervention in the climate system, which should in any case be prevented according to Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change," said Thomas Stocker, professor of climate and environmental physics at the University.
