BJP MP Dubey suspects role of foreign powers behind massive feedback on Waqf bill, seeks MHA probe
Dubey told Pal that it is essential to ask whether foreign entities, organisations, and individuals may be deliberately orchestrating this "flood of responses to manipulate the democratic process".
NEW DELHI: Raising concern over the staggering number of feedback -- nearly 1.25 crore submissions -- received by the parliamentary committee scrutinising the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, BJP member Nishikant Dubey has called for a home ministry probe, including into possible role of Pakistan's ISI and China.
In a letter to the committee's chairperson Jagdambika Pal, he said the investigation must also cover the possible roles of fundamentalist organisations, individuals like radical Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, and foreign powers such as the ISI and China besides their proxies.
Dubey, a committee member and a fourth-term Lok Sabha MP, said the geographical origins of these submissions need immediate attention, claiming that it is statistically improbable that such an overwhelming volume response could emerge organically from within India alone.
He described the volume of feedback as "unprecedented" which, he said, has set a global record for legislative submissions and deserves scrutiny over the motivations and sources behind these communications.
He said it signals a disturbing trend that cannot be ignored. "I believe it is vital that the committee addresses these concerns head-on to ensure the integrity and independence of our legislative process," he added.
The committee examining the contentious bill, which has been opposed stridently by opposition parties and several Muslim groups for its alleged attempt to interfere in their religious affairs, had come out with an advertisement, seeking people's feedback on its provisions.
As his letter sparked a debate, Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the consultation process undertaken by the committee is the most extensive in the history of the country's parliamentary democracy.
He, however, declined to comment on Dubey's suspicions.
"I can't comment on the functioning of the joint parliamentary committee. It has been empowered, how mails have come in and in what circumstances, that is for the JPC to look into," he said.
Dubey told Pal that it is essential to ask whether foreign entities, organisations, and individuals may be deliberately orchestrating this "flood of responses to manipulate the democratic process".
Urging him to ask the Ministry of Home Affairs to conduct a thorough investigation, he said the probe finding should be circulated to all members of the committee to ensure complete transparency.
India has a robust parliamentary system, and any attempt to influence it through coordinated foreign intervention represent a direct threat to national sovereignty, he asserted.
Citing media reports, he said the content of a large portion of these submissions is identical or contains minor variations, signalling that many of these communications may be part of an organised campaign.
"It is not uncommon for special interest groups, both foreign and domestic, to use this tactic to saturate the legislative process with pre-drafted suggestions or demands, giving the illusion of mass public support. This orchestrated effort undermines the very purpose of soliciting genuine public feedback," he said.
Hinting at the role of Islamic fundamentalist organisation, he said these groups often funded or influenced by outside powers seek to divide India along religious lines, destabilising its democracy and disrupting our legislative processes.
He said, "There is reason to suspect that these elements are leveraging the Waqf Bill deliberations to sow discord and polarise public opinion. These efforts are not isolated but part of a broader strategy by fundamentalist groups to manipulate sensitive issues in our country."
The influence of a radical Islamist peacher Zakir Naik cannot be underestimated, he said.
There are credible concerns that Naik and his network may be involved in orchestrating this deluge of submissions to the Waqf Bill, leveraging the issue to further his extremist rhetoric, he added, noting that Naik is a fugitive wanted in India for promoting hate speech and inciting terrorism.
Dubey also mentioned foreign powers like Pakistani spy agency ISI, China, and radical organisations like Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh and the Taliban.
Given the sheer volume of submissions and their questionable content, it is entirely plausible that foreign actors are attempting to influence the legislative process, he said.
"If foreign intelligence agencies are behind this flood of submissions, it would constitute an unprecedented attack on Indian sovereignty and a deliberate attempt to compromise the independence of Parliament," he added.
Noting that Article 105 of the Constitution guarantees the free and fair functioning of Parliament, including the operations of its committees, he said any attempt by external forces to manipulate the legislative process will be an attack on the very foundations of parliamentary system.
He said an investigation by the MHA is critical to preserving the fairness, integrity, and independence of the Waqf Bill deliberations.
The Waqf bill deliberations, he stressed, must proceed without the interference of outside influences that aim to destabilise, delay, and disrupt the process.
The committee, whose meetings have been marked by fiery exchanges between BJP and opposition members, has been holding extensive consultations and has held frequent day-long deliberations as it rushes to meet the deadline of submitting its recommendatons to Parliament in the first week of winter session.